Inquiries & Recommendations
Ngā ketuketutanga me ngā tūtohunga
Ngā ketuketutanga me ngā tūtohunga
Search Results
Aviation
AO-2005-005
[A preliminary investigation showed that the circumstances were not likely to have significant implications for transport safety. Consistent with section 13 of the TAIC Act the Commission discontinued the investigation and no report was published.]
Incident date: Publish date:
Aviation
AO-2005-004
[A preliminary investigation showed that the circumstances were not likely to have significant implications for transport safety. Consistent with section 13 of the TAIC Act the Commission discontinued the investigation and no report was published.]
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-115
On Friday 1 April 2005, Train 2100 was a scheduled empty passenger service being positioned to Waitakere to start passenger operations for the day. At 0627, soon after the train had passed through Ranui station, the coupling between the locomotive and the guard’s van parted. As a result of the parting, the automatic brake system lost all air pressure and brought the train to a stop.
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-114
[Investigation incorporated in report 04-130. Please refer to that report.]
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-113
[A preliminary investigation showed that the circumstances were not likely to have significant implications for transport safety. Consistent with section 13 of the TAIC Act the Commission discontinued the investigation and no report was published.]
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-112
Hi-rail vehicle passenger express Train 200, track occupancy incident, near Taumarunui, 7 March 2005
On Monday 7 March 2005 at about 1651, the Wellington to Auckland Overlander passenger express Train 200 departed from Taumarunui and entered the section ahead. At about 1658 the locomotive engineer was required to stop his train when he became aware of a hi-rail vehicle on the track in front of him.
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-108
On Wednesday 23 February 2005, at about 0855, Train 3334, a Papakura to Britomart diesel multiple unit passenger train, suffered a traction engine fire while it was stopped at Signal 125, Auckland. The passengers were safely evacuated while the locomotive engineer multiple unit extinguished the fire using dry-powder fire extinguishers that were carried on board the train. There were no injuries. The safety issues identified were: • the cleanliness of the engine surround • monitoring engine compression and crankcase pressures
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-110
[Investigation incorporated in report 04-130. Please refer to that report.]
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-109
On Sunday 20 February 2005 at about 1300, the Driving Creek Train Linx derailed at Peg 1660. The rear bogie of the last passenger set derailed and was dragged about 15 m before one of the derailment bars hit a rail joint fishplate, causing the rear bogie to jump further to the left-hand side of the track. One passenger received moderate injuries. In the afternoon of Sunday 27 February 2005, the rear bogie of the last passenger set of the Train Linx derailed to the inside of a tight right-hand curve at Peg 1270 on the Driving Creek Railway. There were no injuries.
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-111
On Wednesday 9 February 2005 at about 1500, a descending barrier arm at Norton Road level crossing, Hamilton, struck a school bus conveying 16 passengers when the level crossing warning devices activated for the passage of express freight Train 312. The school bus could not clear the level crossing because of traffic banked up in front of and behind it. Train 312 was stationary at the time and the locomotive engineer became aware of the school bus before he moved his train. There were no injuries.
Incident date: Publish date:
Rail
RO-2005-107
On Monday 14 February 2005, at about 0831, Train 3037, a Connex Auckland Limited Britomart to Papakura via Newmarket diesel multiple unit passenger train was wrong routed past Signal 30RAC at Westfield to an industrial siding, instead of the Down main. While attempting to regain the correct path, the locomotive engineer multiple unit passed Signal 36LD at stop and travelled ‘wrong line ’ on the Down main where he stopped adjacent to a signal that applied to the opposite main. There were no conflicting movements approaching Train 3037 in either situation.
Incident date: Publish date:
Maritime
MO-2005-203
[A preliminary investigation showed that the circumstances were not likely to have significant implications for transport safety. Consistent with section 13 of the TAIC Act the Commission discontinued the investigation and no report was published.]
Incident date: Publish date: